Miguel Almirón Returns to Atlanta United: A Homecoming Celebration 
In a significant legal victory, Major League Soccer (MLS) and the U.S. Soccer Federation have successfully defended themselves against a $500 million antitrust lawsuit brought by the North American Soccer League (NASL). The jury’s unanimous decision marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing evolution of professional soccer in the United States.
Key Takeaways
- The jury ruled in favor of MLS and U.S. Soccer, dismissing NASL’s claims of conspiracy.
- The trial lasted three weeks and included testimonies from notable figures in soccer.
- NASL plans to appeal the verdict, prolonging the legal battle.
Background of the Lawsuit
The NASL, which folded in 2018, alleged that MLS and U.S. Soccer conspired to create an anticompetitive environment that stifled competition from emerging leagues. The lawsuit claimed that the close ties between the two organizations, particularly through Soccer United Marketing, prevented NASL from obtaining necessary league sanctioning.
The Trial Process
The trial, held in the Eastern District of New York, featured a 10-person jury that deliberated after three weeks of testimonies. Key points included:
- Allegations of Conspiracy: NASL’s attorneys argued that MLS and U.S. Soccer worked together to deny NASL the Division II status it needed to compete effectively.
- Defense Arguments: The defense maintained that NASL’s failures were due to its own mismanagement and not the result of any conspiracy. They pointed to the league’s financial troubles and the criminal indictment of its largest investor as contributing factors to its demise.
Notable Testimonies
The trial included testimonies from various witnesses, including:
- Carmelo Anthony: The NBA star and owner of Puerto Rico FC in NASL provided insights into the league’s challenges.
- Rocco Commisso: The owner of the New York Cosmos and a significant backer of the lawsuit, Commisso’s testimony revealed tensions and controversies surrounding the NASL’s operations.
Jury’s Verdict
On February 3, 2025, the jury delivered a unanimous verdict in favor of MLS and U.S. Soccer, concluding that NASL had failed to provide sufficient evidence of a conspiracy. The ruling was met with relief from MLS, which stated that the lawsuit was an attempt by NASL to deflect blame for its own failures.
Future Implications
Despite the verdict, NASL’s lead attorney announced plans to appeal, indicating that the legal battle may continue for years. The outcome of this case could have lasting effects on the structure and governance of professional soccer in the U.S., as it highlights the complexities of league relationships and the regulatory environment.
Conclusion
The resolution of this lawsuit is a crucial moment for MLS and U.S. Soccer, affirming their positions in the American soccer landscape. As the sport continues to grow, the implications of this case will likely influence future league dynamics and competition in the years to come.
