Menu

Latest News Item

Daily News

Subscribe to get the trending stories straight into your inbox!

Don't worry, we don't spam
Lawyers arguing in a courtroom during an antitrust case.

Courtroom Showdown: NASL Takes On MLS and U.S. Soccer in Landmark Antitrust Case

3 days ago

The long-awaited antitrust trial involving the North American Soccer League (NASL), Major League Soccer (MLS), and the U.S. Soccer Federation (USSF) has commenced in Brooklyn, New York. This case, which has been in the making for eight years, could reshape the landscape of professional soccer in the United States, with over $500 million in damages at stake.

Key Takeaways

  • The NASL alleges that the USSF and MLS conspired to undermine its operations, leading to its dissolution in 2018.
  • The trial is expected to last three to four weeks, featuring high-profile witnesses from the sports world.
  • The outcome could have significant implications for the future of soccer leagues in the U.S.

Background of the Case

The NASL, which operated from 2011 to 2017, filed a lawsuit against the USSF after it was denied Division II status. The league claims that the USSF and MLS colluded to prevent it from competing effectively, ultimately leading to its closure. The NASL argues that the USSF’s standards for league recognition were applied in a discriminatory manner, favoring MLS.

In contrast, the USSF maintains that NASL’s failure to meet the necessary criteria for Division II status was the reason for its downfall. They argue that NASL never turned a profit and failed to secure broadcasting or sponsorship deals, which are critical for a league’s sustainability.

The Trial Unfolds

The trial began with opening statements from both sides, highlighting the starkly different narratives surrounding the NASL’s demise. NASL’s lead attorney, Jeffrey Kessler, emphasized the insular nature of American soccer, suggesting that the established powers were unwilling to allow competition from NASL.

  • Key Points from Opening Statements:
    • Kessler described the soccer landscape as a “small, insular world” where competition is not welcomed.
    • He accused USSF and MLS of entering into a conspiracy to apply standards unfairly against NASL.
    • USSF’s attorney, Christopher Yates, countered that the standards were essential for the growth of soccer in the U.S.

Witnesses and Testimonies

The trial is expected to feature testimonies from several notable figures, including:

  1. Cindy Parlow Cone – President of U.S. Soccer
  2. Don Garber – Commissioner of MLS
  3. Carmelo Anthony – Former NBA star and NASL team owner
  4. Clark Hunt – CEO of the Kansas City Chiefs and FC Dallas owner

These testimonies will provide insight into the operational dynamics of soccer leagues and the decisions made by governing bodies.

Potential Implications

If NASL succeeds in proving its case, it could lead to significant financial repercussions for both the USSF and MLS, with potential damages tripling under antitrust laws. This case not only has financial stakes but also the potential to alter the competitive landscape of soccer in the U.S., affecting how leagues are sanctioned and recognized in the future.

As the trial progresses, the soccer community is watching closely, aware that the outcome could redefine the sport’s hierarchy in North America. The proceedings are set to continue for several weeks, with both sides prepared to present extensive evidence and witness testimonies to support their claims.

Sources

Written By

Jordan Westbrook is a dedicated journalist with a profound passion for Major League Soccer. With extensive experience in sports journalism, Jordan leads MLS News Today in delivering timely and insightful content to soccer enthusiasts. Beyond the newsroom, Jordan enjoys attending live matches and engaging in discussions about soccer strategies with fellow fans.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *